In Colombia, “mass mobilization” needed to counter Trump’s candidate

by Jim Hodgson

U.S. President Donald Trump has again interfered in a Latin American election, this time endorsing far-right candidate Abelardo de la Espriella in Colombia’s June 21 presidential runoff. Trump called him a “smart, strong, and tough leader” and described his opponent, Senator Iván Cepeda, as a “radical left Marxist.”

I beg to differ. Cepeda is a long-time human rights defender. My first awareness of his work dates from 2008 when he was with the National Movement of Victims of State Crimes (MOVICE). The first time that I can remember meeting him was in November 2015 at a breakfast meeting in Bogotá. By then he was a senator and had joined about 60 people from church and other civil society groups to hear reports from the peace negotiations that sputtered along in Havana ahead of the 2016 agreement.

Cepeda and de la Espriella will face each other in a second round of presidential voting on June 21. They were the top two candidates after a first round of voting May 31. De la Espriella won 44 per cent of votes, while Cepeda obtained 41 per cent. 

Petro urges mass mobilization

Colombia’s incumbent president, Gustavo Petro, swiftly condemned Trump’s backing of de la Espriella as a threat to Colombian sovereignty.

“When a country interferes in the decisions of another country, freedom dies,” Petro wrote. “I invite all of Colombia to vote in full freedom and not become either slaves or a colony of anyone.” Petro invoked Simón Bolívar and Antonio Nariño, the founding fathers of Colombian independence from Spain in the early 19th century, to draw a parallel between historical colonial subjugation and what he characterized as modern American meddling. “If the heart of the world loses its freedom and sovereignty, the hope of the world and of Colombia fades away.”

Petro had earlier cast the presidential runoff as a historic struggle between democracy and what he called “mafia fascism,” accusing de la Espriella of ties to paramilitary death squads and alleging widespread vote-buying during the first round. Petro argued that fascist movements have produced catastrophic human suffering wherever they have ruled and said Colombians have a moral obligation to defeat them at the ballot box.

For his part, Cepeda challenged his opponent to a public debate and called for an investigation into what he described as 885,000 electoral irregularities in the first-round vote, also alleging foreign interference in the election.

“Every single ant is out moving mountains”

Among international observers, Rev. Emilie Teresa Smith of the Anglican diocese of New Westminster (B.C.) said in a Facebook post June 3 that “the forces of manipulation and corruption are deep and powerful.”

She looked at the context: that Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio had already re-configured the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine and declared Abya Yala (Latin America and the Caribbean) “their territory to control, exploit and destroy.” 

Smith also pointed to the April audio leaks of Honduran leaders, including convicted drug-trafficker and former president Juan Orlando Hernández. Together these comprise “Hondurasgate,” an international conspiracy to influence the last election in Honduras and to “extend the same operation across the region, targeting the progressive governments of Latin America.”

She also wrote of preparations for the next round of voting: “Every single ant is out moving mountains.”

In its observation report, the San Francisco-based human rights group Global Exchange said that for the first time in Colombian history, the U.S. embassy sent 86 observers to the polls. Among them was Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno, born in Bogotá and now a close Trump ally. Weeks earlier, he warned that Washington might refuse to recognize results if evidence of coercion emerged and conditioned future U.S. assistance explicitly on the election’s outcome. A Florida member of the House of Representatives, María Elvira Salazar, went further. She publicly endorsed de la Espriella and urged Colombians to vote for him. After the vote, Moreno reported that the elections were “completely free and well run.”

The first-round result was unexpectedly close. The vote for a third candidate, Paloma Valencia, seemed to collapse, despite backing from former hard-right president Álvaro Uribe. 

The election also had a higher voter turnout – almost 58 per cent – than any first-round vote since the new constitution came into force in 1991. To win, Cepeda will need to add to Petro’s coalition. 

“What happens in Colombia on June 21 will not stay in Colombia,” concluded the Global Exchange report. “It will send a signal to every progressive movement in the hemisphere about whether it is possible to govern — and to be succeeded — under the weight of the Donroe Doctrine.”

The Vatican’s mass for the “beloved people of Cuba”

The following homily was delivered by Cardinal Michael Czerny, the Canadian Jesuit who is prefect for the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, at a Mass for Peace and Social Development in Cuba. The mass was celebrated at the Church of St. Ignatius of Loyola in Rome on May 15. 

We have heard the Word of God that the liturgy offers us on this Friday of the sixth week of Easter. A Word imbued with perseverance and hope. In the passage from the Acts of the Apostles, we see Paul weary, tried and faced with misunderstanding and rejection. Yet the Lord says to him: “Do not be afraid; keep on speaking and do not be silent.” It is a word that sustains the believer’s heart in the difficult times of history. A word that preserves trust when everything seems fragile and precarious.

In the Gospel according to John, we have heard another powerful image: that of the woman suffering the pangs of childbirth who then, at the birth of the child, experiences a new joy, capable of transfiguring the pain she has endured. Jesus speaks thus to his disciples to prepare them for the time of trial, teaching them that the suffering of history is not alien to God’s work and that every authentic human journey toward peace and justice requires patience, discernment and spiritual courage.

Dear brothers and sisters, dear institutional representatives, ambassadors and authorities present here, this evening we bring before the Lord’s altar the sufferings, hopes and expectations of the Cuban people. We do so with respect, with sincerity, with deep affection for a land that cherishes a history rich in dignity, culture, sacrifice, faith and resilience.

The church’s social teaching clearly reminds us that true peace is founded on moral and spiritual pillars even before political or economic ones. In “Pacem in Terris,” St. John XXIII identified truth, justice, freedom and love as the indispensable conditions for a form of human coexistence worthy of the human person. These words retain an extraordinary power even in our own time.

Justice demands concrete attention to those who suffer most. 

Freedom calls for real opportunities for participation, listening and shared responsibility.

Truth becomes a form of sincere dialogue, capable of overcoming propaganda, hardening attitudes and mutual mistrust. 

Love opens the way to solidarity, to the sharing of material, cultural and spiritual goods amongst peoples.

From this perspective, any logic of constant confrontation risks exacerbating the burden already weighing on ordinary people, especially the poorest, the elderly, the sick and children. Pope Leo XIV, in his recent appeals to the international community, has reminded us that no stable order can arise from the force of arms or from pressure that humiliates peoples; human development, on the other hand, grows through dialogue, international law, cooperation between nations and the safeguarding of the dignity of every human being. In the same spirit, humanitarian aid should arrive in sufficient quantities and without hindrance and must never be exploited for political or geopolitical ends. 

During his 2015 apostolic journey to Cuba, Pope Francis also emphasized, in his historic homily at the Plaza de la Revolución in Havana, the urgent need to place the concrete person at the center of social and political life, especially the vulnerable, the wounded and the poor. He said that service “is never ideological,” because it arises from genuine attention to the face of the other; “we do not need ideas, but people.” Those words remain highly relevant today.

The appeal of St. John Paul II still resonates with prophetic intensity: “May the world open up to Cuba, and may Cuba open up to the world.” It was not a political slogan. It was a spiritual and human invitation to break down walls of misunderstanding, to create spaces for mutual trust, and to allow peoples to meet without fear.

We are here this evening above all to pray. In a short while, the Eucharist will make present the Paschal sacrifice of Christ, the crucified and risen Lord who bears within himself the suffering of peoples and the wounds of history. Before him we entrust Cuban families, young people in search of hope, those in positions of authority, those who suffer, and those who await more peaceful days.

The Gospel offers us a promise: “Your sorrow will turn into joy.” This is no naive promise. It is the Christian certainty that God continues to work within human history even when darkness and confusion prevail. The Holy Spirit continues to raise up men and women capable of building fraternity, reconciliation and paths of peace.

Let us pray, then, that the beloved land of Cuba may know days of greater serenity, of authentic human and social development, of harmony and hope. Let us pray that every political, economic and international decision may be guided by wisdom, prudence and a sincere search for the good of all people. Let us pray that the Lord may turn the hearts of men and women towards universal brotherhood.

And we ask the Virgin of Charity of El Cobre, so dearly loved by the Cuban people, to accompany this nation’s journey with her maternal protection and to watch over all her children in peace.

At the conclusion of the mass, the Cuban ambassador to the Holy See, Leyde Ernesto Rodríguez, expressed gratitude on behalf of the Cuban people and government for the mass, emphasizing that his country is a nation of solidarity, peace, sovereignty, and independence, and “does not pose a threat to the national security of any other nation.”

“We have the right to live in peace, without threats of military aggression, with respect for human dignity, and without obstacles of any kind to our comprehensive economic development,” the diplomat stressed.

Santa Marta: Transitioning away from fossil fuels

By Jim Hodgson

Good news may be hard to find these days. But here’s some. Representatives from about 60 nations met in northern Colombia in April to promote a transition away from fossil fuels.

The First Conference on Transitioning away from Fossil Fuels was a response to frustration felt after recent United Nations COP climate conferences, especially the one held last November in Belém, Brazil. Potential consensus around the transition away from fossil fuels broke down in the face of lobbying by oil companies and opposition from oil-producing nations.

The conference, co-sponsored by Colombia and Netherlands, ended April 29 with a clear message: the global conversation has shifted from whether to phase out oil, gas and coal to how to do it, with financing emerging as one of the biggest obstacles. As in many such international conferences, there were pre-events that gathered people from Indigenous, religious and other sectors.

By all accounts, the gathering in Santa Marta felt different from past climate talks. 

“The mood here in Santa Marta is euphoric,” said Tzeporah Berman, the founder and chair of the fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty initiative. “After years stuck in endless debates about whether to phase out fossil fuels, finally we are focusing on the how. We are no longer fighting for recognition of the problem, but creating solutions. It’s like watching a dam break – all that pent-up experience, knowledge and passion suddenly flowing into concrete ways to phase out dirty fuels. The hope is contagious.”

But participants were not unrealistic. Colombian President Gustavo Petro warned the world could “reach a point of no return” without the Amazon’s role in regulating the climate. Colombia is itself an oil-producing nation, but it has set a path of “gradual transition at home that balances climate goals with economic realities.”

Finding a good way forward requires addressing the global debt crisis. Countries in the global south that want to invest in renewable energy find themselves blocked by having to spend on high interest payments and imported fuel.

After the conference, Canadian scientist and broadcaster David Suzuki wrote: “Climate action requires unhinging power from foreign corporate privilege and putting it toward justice, democracy and the communities most affected.”

The Canadian government sent a representative: Jeanne-Marie Huddleston, Canada’s chief climate change negotiator – not a minister, but an employee of Environment Canada. Absence of a government minister was criticized (above) by Lloyd Axworthy, a former Canadian foreign minister who has emerged as a frequent critic of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s climate priorities – or lack of them.

In recent weeks, Canada has announced approval for expanding liquefied natural gas, a sovereign wealth fund — which among other things could help oil and gas projects of national interest — and its next budget looks to be cushioned by higher oil prices driven by the Iran war.

Participating states agreed to meet again in Tuvalu in early 2027, a gathering to be co-hosted by Ireland. Climate scientists and the UN have warned that the South Pacific island nation could be submerged by 2100 due to rising sea levels.